ASP.NET Tutorial: .slnx is the new reality in.NET;.sln is retired

The.sln file quietly resided at the core of every.NET solution for almost twenty years.
The majority of developers hardly ever made manual edits. Many were afraid to touch it at all. In the hopes that it would "just work," nearly everyone submitted it to source control.

That period is coming to an end in contemporary.NET.

With the release of.NET 10, the SLNX solution file format—which was first available as a preview feature in the.NET 9 SDK (version 9.0.200 or later)—became the standard solution format.

Microsoft is making a clear change with the release of.slnx: solution files are now first-class, tool-friendly assets rather than IDE artifacts.

Although this modification may not seem significant at first, it signifies a significant advancement in the definition, versioning, and automation of.NET solutions. 

Why .sln No Longer Fits Modern .NET

The original .sln format was designed in a very different world:

• Windows-first development

• Visual Studio as the center of everything

• Small, monolithic solutions

• Minimal CI/CD automation

Over time, these assumptions broke down.

Real Problems with .sln

• Proprietary and opaque format

• Heavy reliance on GUIDs instead of intent

• Extremely noisy Git diffs

• Frequent merge conflicts

• Hard to generate or modify programmatically

• Tightly coupled to Visual Studio

In modern environments — cloud, containers, CI pipelines, mono-repos — .sln became friction instead of glue.

Enter .slnx: A Modern Solution Format

.slnx is not just a new extension. It is a re-thinking of what a solution file should be in today’s .NET ecosystem.

Core Design Goals of .slnx

• Human-readable and declarative

• Deterministic and diff-friendly

• Tooling-agnostic

• Easy to automate

• Cross-platform by default

• Ready for future tooling evolution

In short, .slnx describes what your solution is, not how a specific IDE manages it.

Side-by-Side: .sln vs .slnx

Classic .sln Example

Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 12.00
# Visual Studio Version 17
VisualStudioVersion = 17.0.34902.247
MinimumVisualStudioVersion = 10.0.40219.1
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "MyWebAppl", "src\MyWebAppl\MyWebAppl.csproj", "{A1B2C3D4-E5F6-7890-1234-567890ABCDEF}"
EndProject
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "MyLibrary", "src\MyLibrary\MyLibrary.csproj", "{F0E9D8C7-B6A5-4321-FE09-87654321FEDC}"
EndProject
Global
    GlobalSection(SolutionConfigurationPlatforms) = preSolution
        Debug|Any CPU = Debug|Any CPU
        Release|Any CPU = Release|Any CPU
    EndGlobalSection
    // ... more complex sections
EndGlobal

Modern .slnx Example

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.Build.NoTargets">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <SolutionDir>$(SolutionDir)</SolutionDir>
    <SolutionGuid>...</SolutionGuid>
  </PropertyGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
    <ProjectReference Include="src\MyWebAppl\MyWebAppl.csproj" />
    <ProjectReference Include="src\MyLibrary\MyLibrary.csproj" />
  </ItemGroup>
</Project>

What This Comparison Tells Us

Aspect	.sln	.slnx
Readability	Low	High
Noise	High	Minimal
GUID dependency	Required	Not needed
Git diffs	Noisy	Clean
Automation	Fragile	Easy
Cross-platform	Limited	Native

This isn’t just cleaner — it’s structurally better.

Git, CI/CD, and Automation: Where .slnx Shines

Git Diffs (Real-World Scenario)

.sln diff:

- VisualStudioVersion = 17.7.34012.45
+ VisualStudioVersion = 17.8.34519.123

No functional change. Still causes conflicts.

.slnx diff:

+ <Project Path="Api/Api.csproj" />

Clear intent. Reviewable. Safe.

Why This Matters

• Faster code reviews

• Fewer merge conflicts

• Reliable CI pipelines

• Safer automation

This is especially important in:

• Large teams

• Mono-repos

• Microservices architectures

Tooling-Agnostic by Design

.sln evolved as a Visual Studio artifact.
.slnx is designed for an ecosystem.

It works naturally with:

• dotnet CLI

• Visual Studio

• CI/CD agents

• Linux & macOS

• Future editors and AI tooling

This aligns perfectly with modern .NET’s direction:

CLI-first, cloud-first, automation-first.

Large Solutions and Mono-Repos

As solutions grow:

• .sln becomes slower to load

• Merge conflicts increase

• Manual fixes become common

.slnx is far better suited for:

• Modular architectures

• Multi-project repositories

• Selective tooling and partial builds

Its declarative structure enables deterministic and scalable solution management.

Is .sln Gone Today?

No — and that’s intentional.

Microsoft is handling this transition responsibly:

• .sln continues to work

• .slnx adoption is incremental

• No forced migration

• Side-by-side coexistence

This mirrors previous successful transitions:

• Old .csproj → SDK-style projects

• Legacy build systems → modern MSBuild

The Bigger Picture: Why This Change Matters

On its own, .slnx may feel minor.

But history shows:

Seemingly boring infrastructure changes often unlock the biggest productivity gains.

.slnx is part of a broader .NET philosophy:

• Less ceremony

• More clarity

• Better defaults

• Tooling that scales with teams

This is how platforms mature.

What You Should Know About .SLNX

1. Works Across Tools and Platforms: .slnx is supported not only in Visual Studio, but also in the .NET CLI, MSBuild, and VS Code, making solution management consistent no matter which tool or OS you use.

2. Seamless Migration from Existing .sln Files: You can convert existing .sln files to .slnx easily via the .NET CLI or directly from Visual Studio using “Save Solution As…”, allowing a smooth transition without disrupting your workflow.

3. Compatible with Solution Filters: If your projects use .slnf files (solution filters), they continue to work after migration — you just need to point them to the new .slnx file.

4. Extensions Continue to Work: Most Visual Studio extensions that interact with solution files will continue functioning, though extensions that edit solution files directly may require updates to fully support .slnx.

5. Recommended Single-Format Strategy: While both .sln and .slnx can exist temporarily during a phased migration, it’s best for teams to standardize on .slnx to avoid confusion and ensure smooth automation.

6. XML-Based for Clarity and Tooling: The .slnx format uses XML, which is widely supported and easier to read and automate than the old .sln text format. It aligns solution representation with .csproj files, simplifying cross-tool usage.

7. Minimum Tooling Requirements: To work with .slnx, ensure you’re using Visual Studio 17.13+ or .NET SDK 9.0.200+, so all tools in your environment understand the new format.

These points are summarized and interpreted from guidance shared by the Visual Studio team to help developers transition confidently to the new .slnx solution format.

Key Takeaways

.sln served .NET well — but it belongs to a different era.

.slnx represents:

• Modern collaboration

• Clean source control

• Cloud-native development

• Future-ready tooling

It’s not flashy. It’s not loud. But it will quietly improve the daily lives of .NET developers for years.

Sometimes the most important improvements are the ones you don’t notice — until they’re gone.

HostForLIFE is Best Option for ASP.NET Core 10.0 Hosting in Europe

Frankly speaking, HostForLIFE is best option to host your ASP.NET Core 10.0 Hosting in Europe. You just need to spend €2.97/month to host your site with them and you can install the latest ASP.NET Core 10.0 via their Plesk control panel. We would highly recommend them as your ASP.NET Core 9.0 Hosting in Europe.